Thursday December 4, 2008 9:34 AM AEST
Latest Comments
"I like this"
by nanwin | Dec 3, 2008 3:05 PM
 
"Concerned man's comments seem to intimate that if I'm using agents all will be well but the ..."
by Werner K | Nov 26, 2008 8:36 PM
 
"That will enhance Microsoft Office system, including SharePoint - good platform for enterprise ..."
by SGE | Nov 25, 2008 3:29 PM
 
"how many users allow per session? because the digital persona password manager allows only 10 ..."
by Daniel | Nov 25, 2008 12:14 AM
 
"security through obscurity...shows how detached HIPAA is from reality."
by priceOfFishInChina | Nov 20, 2008 1:19 PM

LANDesk Patch Manager

  • Email a Friend
  • Print Page
LANDesk Patch Manager
Product Info
Supplier:
Product Rating
Features:  5
Ease of Use:  4
Performance:  5
Documentation:  4
Support:  4
Value for Money:  4
Overall Rating:  Overall Rating
 
For: A provider with established credentials and customers in message filtering and policy management, and a great product.
Against: More important features have yet to roll out.
Verdict: Top-class filtering and policy management as a managed service.
By Robert Jaques
Mar 1, 2006 12:00 AM
Tags: LANDesk | Patch | Manager | (Patch | management | 2006)

This product can run on its own, but really comes into its own when integrated with Landesk’s other offerings. This mix and match approach offers an impressive degree of flexibility. But, for some, this level of choice might make the initial installation appear daunting.

There was no written documentation, not even a quick-start guide for this relatively complex application suite, but the firm’s website was very useful, and the menu-driven installation wizard from the product CD was very easy to navigate. There was also a useful selection of well-written, but very long, deployment and users’ guides on the CD.

 

For the test, we opted to install the Patch Manager as well as the Management Suite because it automatically installs with this top-level component, and only needs to be activated if required.


The server-based installation, as you might expect for a product with such powerful enterprise functionality, was quite complex and requires additional components. The set-up process checks if necessary elements are installed. Windows 2000 Server, Advanced Server or Windows 2003 Standard or Enterprise Server were the required operating systems.


The set-up application also checks for the presence of additional required components, including .NET Framework 1.1, a valid domain controller, database connectivity in the form of Microsoft Data Access Components (MDAC) 2.8 or higher, an installed IIS web server, ASP.NET. It also checks for any installed LANDesk Agents.


After deploying the Management Suite, we were able to set about deploying Patch Manager as an agent, and any combination of the extra modules, if required.


Users can download a current listing of the latest known security and patch content either manually or via a scheduled regular update task to occur at set times.


An impressive feature is the sheer number and variety of views that are available from the comprehensive management console. This helps to make this complex interface more user friendly by allowing users to drag and drop windows providing data on various system elements into the most useful configurations. Thus the process of determining exactly which machines need to be updated with which patches can be easily viewed.

 
Ads by Google
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
Be the first to comment on this article.

Report this comment as offensive:

   * Indicates information we require to process your submission.

Name: *
Email: *
Reason for offense: *
Your report will not be displayed.  
Name:
*
 
Email:
(will not be displayed)
*
 
Comment:
(HTML not permitted)
*
 
Validation
*

Enter the code you see below:

 

 
 
 
 
 
Tripwire - Click here to win an iTouch
 
 
Patch Management Whitepapers