Latest Comments
"im not receiving my emails can send but cant receive.was fine last night this morning not working"
by r reid | Mar 19, 2010 2:24 AM
 
"hmm... the article sounds very good but isn't his last point spamcop? don't we already have ..."
by anon | Mar 18, 2010 2:35 PM
 
"The claim listed above that NetRegistry CEO Larry Bloch said - and I quote "giving over your ..."
by Joe Baptista | Mar 18, 2010 12:39 PM
 
"yes a survey of 24000 who actually understand the issue rather than a survey of 24000 semi-tech-i..."
by Ash | Mar 18, 2010 12:19 AM
 
"Have the EFA produced the definitive and clear quote yet where Conroy calls his critics ..."
by Mazza | Mar 17, 2010 5:41 PM

SA backs down on unpopular censorship law

  • Email a Friend
  • Print Page
SA backs down on unpopular censorship law
By Munir Kotadia
Feb 3, 2010 11:59 AM
Tags: censorship | sa | south | australia, | election | government | legal | idelaw | Michael | Atkinson
Anonymous comments allowed again.

The Attorney General Michael Atkinson has promised to repeal a law that banned anonymous comments made about election issues or people.

In a statement to South Australia news site Adelaide Now, Atkinson said "the blogging generation believes that the law supported by all MPs and all political parties is unduly restrictive... I will immediately after the election move to repeal the law retrospectively."

"This way, no one need fear now that they are being censored on the net or in blogs, whether they blog under their own name or anonymously," he added.click to view full size image

Atkinson's statement last night was followed by a tweet from SA premier Mike Rann, who said: "AG has listened. So no debate will be stifled. No political censorship of blogs or on-line comments whether named or anon."

The controversial law (PDF) seemed to require any comments about election-related issues or people to include the name and address of the person responsible for those comments.

Privacy, legal and security experts all agreed that the law was not only unenforceable, it might also have put voters at risk from cyber-criminals, who thrive from collecting personal information.

Before Atkinson's u-turn, legal expert Kay Lam-Beattie, principal of Idealaw, told iTnews that the law was confusing and its wording unclear.

Lam-Beattie said if the law had been fully enforced, it would have required publications such as iTnews.com.au to:

  • Get peoples' names and addresses if they're posting comments
  • Post relevant names and postcodes to individual comments.
  • Store those details for six months

Alternatively, the publications would have to block traffic from South Australia.

 
Ads by Google
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
Be the first to comment on this article.

Report this comment as offensive:

   * Indicates information we require to process your submission.

Name: *
Email: *
Reason for offense: *
Your report will not be displayed.  
Name:
*
 
Email:
(will not be displayed)
*
 
Comment:
(HTML not permitted)
*
 
Validation
*

Enter the code you see below:

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Whitepapers