Latest Comments
"Mifare 1K,4K,DESfire 4K,Sle4442,T5577,PVC card,KeyFob,ID card,Magstripe card Dear Sir/Madam, ..."
by Jucy | Mar 12, 2010 1:05 PM
 
"Hi Everybody Guys>> How r u? >>I Am S.M.Moshin Arafat (jony) >> I Am a Very Simple Person & I ..."
by Moshin Arafat | Mar 12, 2010 10:29 AM
 
"Sounds funny. Did they ever tell the customers in plainly-worded language that the co-lo space ..."
by Dave - The Network Mule | Mar 11, 2010 10:28 AM
 
"Sunglasses of wto-store.com www.wto-store.com Versace Sunglasses http://wto-store.com/catego..."
by Luxury Handbags 100% Authentic, 2010 Lastest Styles, Buy Now! | Mar 10, 2010 8:59 PM
 
"First Post Hooray"
by Random Stranger | Mar 10, 2010 12:38 PM

SA backs down on unpopular censorship law

  • Email a Friend
  • Print Page
SA backs down on unpopular censorship law
By Munir Kotadia
Feb 3, 2010 11:59 AM
Tags: censorship | sa | south | australia, | election | government | legal | idelaw | Michael | Atkinson
Anonymous comments allowed again.

The Attorney General Michael Atkinson has promised to repeal a law that banned anonymous comments made about election issues or people.

In a statement to South Australia news site Adelaide Now, Atkinson said "the blogging generation believes that the law supported by all MPs and all political parties is unduly restrictive... I will immediately after the election move to repeal the law retrospectively."

"This way, no one need fear now that they are being censored on the net or in blogs, whether they blog under their own name or anonymously," he added.click to view full size image

Atkinson's statement last night was followed by a tweet from SA premier Mike Rann, who said: "AG has listened. So no debate will be stifled. No political censorship of blogs or on-line comments whether named or anon."

The controversial law (PDF) seemed to require any comments about election-related issues or people to include the name and address of the person responsible for those comments.

Privacy, legal and security experts all agreed that the law was not only unenforceable, it might also have put voters at risk from cyber-criminals, who thrive from collecting personal information.

Before Atkinson's u-turn, legal expert Kay Lam-Beattie, principal of Idealaw, told iTnews that the law was confusing and its wording unclear.

Lam-Beattie said if the law had been fully enforced, it would have required publications such as iTnews.com.au to:

  • Get peoples' names and addresses if they're posting comments
  • Post relevant names and postcodes to individual comments.
  • Store those details for six months

Alternatively, the publications would have to block traffic from South Australia.

 
Ads by Google
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
Be the first to comment on this article.

Report this comment as offensive:

   * Indicates information we require to process your submission.

Name: *
Email: *
Reason for offense: *
Your report will not be displayed.  
Name:
*
 
Email:
(will not be displayed)
*
 
Comment:
(HTML not permitted)
*
 
Validation
*

Enter the code you see below:

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Whitepapers