Tuesday February 9, 2010 11:22 PM AEST
 
Latest Comments
"I too have been a labor voter for many years and will not be voting for them again. The ..."
by maxt | Feb 9, 2010 7:56 PM
 
"I’ve just had a user receive a rehashed version of this with an attached html file containing a ..."
by Owen Lutz | Feb 9, 2010 6:01 PM
 
"hi"
by manish kumar | Feb 9, 2010 4:27 PM
 
"Hey 'hey con-roy' ... from Google Australia's head of policy Iarla Flynn"We don't believe that ..."
by Keep it real | Feb 9, 2010 3:33 PM
 
"@penno Off-site storage is a good solution unless you have some decent backup software to ..."
by Charmgene | Feb 9, 2010 2:36 PM

Snow Leopard vs Windows 7: Which is more secure?

  • Email a Friend
  • Print Page
Snow Leopard vs Windows 7: Which is more secure?
By Steven Willoughby
Oct 30, 2009 10:13 AM | 10 Comments
Tags: Snow | Leopard | vs | Windows | 7 | Which | is | more | secure
Apple fanboys take heed: you are still vulnerable.

With Microsoft trumpeting the security features of Windows 7, expect a return of the debate over which is more secure - Mac or PC?

In its Get a Mac campaign, Apple has long had fun portraying Windows Vista (Microsoft's previous operating system) as a malware and virus-infested quagmire with unusable security controls. It claimed that Macs are more secure.

Asked for evidence, Mac fans often point to threat-advisory statistics. This year, for example, security experts Secunia issued 29 vulnerability advisories for Microsoft's Windows XP compared to only nine on Apple's OS X.

But are such comparisons fair? Objectively, the answer is no. Firstly, Windows has much more third-party software with which to contend and hackers have a Windows bias.

This bias is due to Apple's market share - 9.4 percent, according to the latest figures.

If you're a hacker, this means that the audience for your exploit is about 10 times less on OS X than Windows. Without the automated malware creation tools that exist for Windows, you'll also have to bring your own Apple developer skills.

Put simply, targeting Apple's platforms costs more and reaches fewer people. If you follow the basic economic rule of opportunity cost (the cost of foregoing alternatives) why would you do it?

What Secunia's statistics reveal is that, with most vulnerabilities closed quite quickly and with only one on each platform remaining unpatched, both companies take security seriously.

Perhaps stung by Vista's reception, Microsoft is certainly showing a renewed security focus in Windows 7.

The first of the new security features is the Windows Biometric Framework - native support for fingerprint scanners and other biometric devices to log on to local machines and corporate domains.

There is a new and improved version of BitLocker (Microsoft's tool for natively encrypting your hard disk) that encrypts USB keys, external hard drives and other portable storage devices.

Finally, there are changes to Vista's derided user account control that promise to make it far less annoying and more intelligent.

Microsoft has put Windows 7's security at the front of its promotional campaign (pictured) and there's no doubt that it will be more secure than Vista. But will it be more secure than OS X?

We could debate the security merits of both all day but until we're booting highly secure EAL6-certified installations of 'Secure OS X' and 'Windows 7 Ultimate Security' (unlikely any time soon), it's up to us to secure ourselves.

What can your average Mac or PC user do to improve their security? Firstly, I'd recommend file and disk encryption. Recent criminal cases have illustrated how impermeable PC-grade encryption has become. There are no excuses for sensitive personal or customer information being exposed on lost or stolen laptops.

Secondly, always back up your data (Windows 7 is much improved over Vista backup). Not only is equipment failure inevitable, but if your computer is ever severely compromised you might want your data on-hand so you can perform a clean install.

Thirdly, if you're a Mac user, don't consider yourself immune. While you are a smaller target, attacks and exploits are still out there. Symantec recently spotted the first Mac botnet in the wild (an army of zombie computers used to send spam or execute denial of service attacks) - proof positive that you should be running anti-virus software as Apple recommends.

Finally, research shows that the easiest way to attack our computers is through social engineering (tricks that fool us into compromising our own systems), rather than through software exploits. Be sure to think security whenever you're online and never give your details to a site unless you're certain of its identity. Anti-virus scanners and operating system features will go so far, but the best security is a security conscious user.

Steven Willoughby is a security specialist and one of Australia's foremost key management experts. He is the technical director of ICT Networks.

Are Apple's security credentials over-hyped, lulling users into a false sense of security that risks their data and privacy? Is Windows 7 the future secure operating system or will it always be attractive to hackers because it's from the maker of the most popular operating systems? Sound off in the comments below and on the forums.

 

 
Ads by Google
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
Comments: 10
i have a small problem when you say that OS X isnt targeted as much, considering when OS 9 was out it had way more viruses and less users market share is a crap excuse
SC Magazine - comments icon Posted by TomOct 30, 2009 2:21 PM
Its the nature of things - as software (and virus's) evolve, newer and better protection needs to be developed. Mac vs PC ads show that Apple is desperate - why else would they use their creativity to so openly attack when could use it more positively. As of now, I am boycotting Apple.
SC Magazine - comments icon Posted by annieOct 30, 2009 2:46 PM
This is an ignorant article - the reality is the architecture of OSX prohibits many programs from being major threats. Windows default users are privileged (administrator) users where as the superuser (root) in OSX is a separate account and if you want to do anything like over write lib files you need to use sudo (you are prompted by a password.) OSX is BSD based (similar to Linux) which is SECURITY focused which has a HUGE base in the server market and has hardly been slammed by malware. Face reality people - there are more viruses and crap for windows because it is easy to write viruses and crap for windows.
SC Magazine - comments icon Posted by Johnny BagoNov 1, 2009 5:33 AM
The only ignorance here is coming from you Johnny, either that or you are deliberately misleading. The whole point of UAC, first introduced in Vista and now significantly improved in Windows 7 is to make it easy for people to run as Standard Users for their everyday PC usage. Simply put Microsoft wants it's customers to use Standard User Accounts and this has been standard for the 3 years that Vista has been out. Anyone using Vista or 7 and using an administrator account by default ought to be educated about the potential security risks of doing so and then make their own choice.
SC Magazine - comments icon Posted by Russell MurrayNov 1, 2009 7:45 AM
Struth you people make it hard for the simple folk to make a judgement of apple vs windows for best operating and safest system. Sounds like biased data for both is in place, by interested parties. I think I will go for apple as I am sick to death with windows freezing despite all the anti virus and defrag. within being up to date
SC Magazine - comments icon Posted by Alan BarryNov 1, 2009 8:40 AM
9.4 percent market share? Apple wish... its well under 4 percent globally. Apple doesn't even make the worldwide sales table in the article from AppleInsider you link to!
SC Magazine - comments icon Posted by RickNov 2, 2009 1:05 PM
"Snow Leopard vs Windows 7: Which is more secure?" I'll answer that quick.. Windows 7 doesn't erase your files after logging in as a guest.. So yeah..
SC Magazine - comments icon Posted by MapDarkNov 2, 2009 1:34 PM
I just want to say that without Microsoft Windows, PC world will not exit. Almost 80% of pc users do not know about Apple OSX8
SC Magazine - comments icon Posted by Eddy KentonNov 11, 2009 4:36 AM
Have to admit I've never heard of Apple OSX8 either...
SC Magazine - comments icon Posted by ConfusedNov 11, 2009 3:46 PM
I have to say that the user creates 90% of the problems on PCs or Macs. I use both at work and home and have never had a virus or malware attack. Also, MapDark, a simple registry error and Windows will clean your hard drive for you quite happily, including all of the Windows files.
SC Magazine - comments icon Posted by Paul NelsonNov 23, 2009 7:36 AM
Report this comment as offensive:

   * Indicates information we require to process your submission.

Name: *
Email: *
Reason for offense: *
Your report will not be displayed.  
Name:
*
 
Email:
(will not be displayed)
*
 
Comment:
(HTML not permitted)
*
 
Validation
*

Enter the code you see below:

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Patch Management Whitepapers