Wednesday February 10, 2010 1:12 AM AEST
 
Latest Comments
"I too have been a labor voter for many years and will not be voting for them again. The ..."
by maxt | Feb 9, 2010 7:56 PM
 
"I’ve just had a user receive a rehashed version of this with an attached html file containing a ..."
by Owen Lutz | Feb 9, 2010 6:01 PM
 
"hi"
by manish kumar | Feb 9, 2010 4:27 PM
 
"Hey 'hey con-roy' ... from Google Australia's head of policy Iarla Flynn"We don't believe that ..."
by Keep it real | Feb 9, 2010 3:33 PM
 
"@penno Off-site storage is a good solution unless you have some decent backup software to ..."
by Charmgene | Feb 9, 2010 2:36 PM

Mobile phone directory service faces consumer uproar

  • Email a Friend
  • Print Page
The first directory enquiry service for UK mobile phone numbers is due to launch on 18 June.

Connectivity, the company behind the 118800 service, has given assurances that privacy will be protected, but consumer watchdog forums are already buzzing with complaints, and privacy groups are up in arms.

Unlike a fixed-line enquiry service, 118800 will not give out numbers. Instead, a user will provide an operator with the name and home town of the party they wish to contact. If the name is in the 118800 database, the operator will call the number and ask permission to connect the caller.

In the event that the called party fails to answer, users can elect for the operator to leave a voice message or send an SMS. Calls to 118800 will be charged at 14p per minute, chargeable per second, plus 69p per call.

A web-based service which uses SMS to request the called party to contact the caller will be launched on the same day on 118800.co.uk charged at £1 per search.

Some members of the public who have seen early publicity for the service have not reacted well in public forums.

"I do not want my mobile numbers on your database," said one contributor to the mobile phone forum on MoneySavingExpert.com.

Privacy groups are also wary of the service. Even Simon Davies of Privacy International, who was hired as a consultant by Connectivity during the development of the service, told The Times that there are "fundamental privacy issues".

"The company needs to be far more specific about where it acquired the numbers on its directory, and from what sources," he said.

Connectivity is adamant that it built the 118800 database from legitimate sources, and has done its utmost not to include anyone under the age of 18 on the database.

Anyone can opt out of the database at anytime by texting 'e' for ex-directory to 118800. The first time anyone is contacted by the service after it launches, they will be given the option to de-list.

Copyright © 2009 v3.co.uk

 
Ads by Google
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
Comments: 15
Hi, Bill from 118800.co.uk here. Just to let you know that we've also added a section on our website where you can make yourself ex-directory: http://www.118800.co.uk/removeme/remove-me.html We haven’t actually launched yet (we launch next Thursday), so we're genuinely interested in getting peoples' feedback so that we can shape the service to make sure people are comfortable with it, and for it to be as useful and reliable as possible. If you have questions or concerns, please contact us using the feedback form on our site. Thanks, Bill 118800.co.uk
SC Magazine - comments icon Posted by BillJun 12, 2009 9:32 PM
Bill, We don't want to be ex-directory. We don't want you having our data fullstop. I didn't give you or anyone else explicit permission either directly or indirectly to store or use my data. Can you please confirm how we can have our data removed completely and permanently from your database? http://www.twitter.com/ripoffbritain for updates on the 118800 privacy disaster.
SC Magazine - comments icon Posted by DesGJun 14, 2009 4:19 AM
don't you even think getting kids mobiles numbers on the web. I am symantec customer for many years, and you should not include children mob. numbers, are you aware whats going on-- if you not come with good solution i will stop your services. pls remove my number and my children. waiting for the response
SC Magazine - comments icon Posted by Katarzyna StrangeJun 30, 2009 8:12 AM
Katarzyna what has this got to do with Symantec??
SC Magazine - comments icon Posted by PaulCJul 2, 2009 12:55 PM
If my mobile no or email address appears anywhere without my permission I WILL SUE FOR PRIVACY LAW.
SC Magazine - comments icon Posted by S A FEELYJul 11, 2009 10:08 PM
I believe my mobile number is private and I should be able to choose who I give it to - none of us agreed to this when we signed our mobile phone contracts
SC Magazine - comments icon Posted by Patricia PurnellJul 12, 2009 4:07 AM
I believe my mobile number is private and I should be able to choose who I give it to - none of us agreed to this when we signed our mobile phone contracts
SC Magazine - comments icon Posted by Patricia PurnellJul 12, 2009 4:10 AM
Well well well its disgusting. One of the reasons I got a mobile was due to the priviacy its gives you . I only give my no to whom I waish . This evashion of privacy its going to far I will also sue for privacy law. so watch this space.
SC Magazine - comments icon Posted by wendy etherington Jul 12, 2009 6:29 AM
Well well well its disgusting. One of the reasons I got a mobile was due to the priviacy its gives you . I only give my no to whom I waish . This evashion of privacy its going to far I will also sue for privacy law. so watch this space.
SC Magazine - comments icon Posted by wendy etherington Jul 12, 2009 6:31 AM
Disgusted at the whole business
SC Magazine - comments icon Posted by brenda b phillipsJul 12, 2009 9:02 PM
Its funny how the website is down for maintenance when we want to remove our numbers from the service. I want my number removed now, and also my husbands
SC Magazine - comments icon Posted by J StephensJul 14, 2009 5:51 PM
I want my mobile to be private.
SC Magazine - comments icon Posted by mrs Deborah Lilian WoodsJul 15, 2009 6:07 AM
I do NOT wish my mobile number to be available to anyone other than those to whom I wish to have it. My landline is already ex-directory for security reasons and to block unsolicited calls of any persuasion.
SC Magazine - comments icon Posted by EveJul 15, 2009 8:27 PM
This will die a death. I'm not going to contact their website, becuase all that will do is confirm that my number is a valid one. Just in the same way that you shouldn't respond to phishing emails, I don't think you should respond to this! By the way, why on earth do children who are of an age to be considered 'vulnerable' carrying mobiles in the first place? How on earth did we cope 10 years ago? Anyone that gives a sub teen a mobile needs their head examined!
SC Magazine - comments icon Posted by Jonathan NixonJul 17, 2009 3:03 AM
this is all fake i keep checking the site and it says on we are working on it we will be with you shortly i checked four months ago and two before that and it says the same thing each time so that says to me it is all a scam to get ppls numbers of them me no way i say
SC Magazine - comments icon Posted by julietSep 27, 2009 3:59 PM
Report this comment as offensive:

   * Indicates information we require to process your submission.

Name: *
Email: *
Reason for offense: *
Your report will not be displayed.  
Name:
*
 
Email:
(will not be displayed)
*
 
Comment:
(HTML not permitted)
*
 
Validation
*

Enter the code you see below:

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Legal Whitepapers