Latest Comments
"trend is good antivirus software."
by jack | Dec 3, 2008 7:02 AM
 
"I feel it with you guys. These irritating interruptions on privacy MUST be stopped. It is a ..."
by Jan Wilmans | Dec 2, 2008 7:11 PM
 
"My AVG WILL NOT UPDATE"
by James Downs | Dec 2, 2008 5:58 AM
 
"Concerned man's comments seem to intimate that if I'm using agents all will be well but the ..."
by Werner K | Nov 26, 2008 8:36 PM
 
"That will enhance Microsoft Office system, including SharePoint - good platform for enterprise ..."
by SGE | Nov 25, 2008 3:29 PM

BLACK HAT: Vista ineffective against browser attacks

  • Email a Friend
  • Print Page
By Chuck Miller
Aug 8, 2008 2:13 PM
Tags: BLACK | HAT: | Vista | ineffective | browser | attacks | Microsoft | XP
The memory protections in Windows Vista are largely ineffective at preventing browser exploitation. This was the position taken by two researchers presenting at the Black Hat conference in Las Vegas.

To prove the point, the researchers, Alexander Sotirov and Mark Dowd, showed an exploit that loaded from Internet Explorer despite all enabled memory protections built into the Vista operating system. 

In explaining the problem, the researchers said that most memory protection mechanisms are based on two things: detecting corruption and stopping common exploit patterns, and attempts to reinforce these are integral to Vista.

But in many cases, some of the built-in protection mechanisms in Vista are not enabled by default for compatibility reasons.

"At the desktop level, compromises had to be made because of compatibility issues. Exploiters have a lot more control over browsers,” Sotirov said.

And in many cases, third-party applications are not compiled to use the Vista memory protections. For example, Java and Flash are not compiled using the critical protection called ASLR.

According to the researchers, part of the reason for this situation is Microsoft's focus on Vista server processes, for which the protections are relatively effective.

According to Sotirov, “This points up the need for more work on secure browser architecture.”

See original article on scmagazineus.com

Secure Computing Magazine

 
Ads by Google
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
Be the first to comment on this article.

Report this comment as offensive:

   * Indicates information we require to process your submission.

Name: *
Email: *
Reason for offense: *
Your report will not be displayed.  
Name:
*
 
Email:
(will not be displayed)
*
 
Comment:
(HTML not permitted)
*
 
Validation
*

Enter the code you see below:

 

 
 
 
 
 
Tripwire - Click here to win an iTouch
 
 
Vulnerabilities & Exploits Whitepapers