Latest Comments
"when i login to face book it tells me i am cookies enabled what does this mean"
by celeste | Nov 21, 2008 5:15 PM
 
"Hi this is the mail I received Brett Karpman show details Nov 17 (3 days ago) Reply Atten..."
by Rodney Churchyard | Nov 20, 2008 6:13 PM
 
"security through obscurity...shows how detached HIPAA is from reality."
by priceOfFishInChina | Nov 20, 2008 1:19 PM
 
"Umm. no. The 6.5 product is mounting the offline VM image and performing a scan for patch ..."
by eric | Nov 20, 2008 8:15 AM
 
"it's great i tried it"
by divyacharan | Nov 20, 2008 12:24 AM

National health-record privacy law in Congress

  • Email a Friend
  • Print Page
By Chuck Miller
Jun 27, 2008 10:11 AM | 1 Comment
Tags: National | health-record | privacy | law | in | Congress
A new law in Congress would require every U.S. citizen to have electronic health records by 2014. It would also set up privacy rules for those records, requiring information keepers to notify patients of security breaches.

The bill, called the "PRO(TECH)T Act," would provide incentives to doctors, hospitals, insurers, and the government to use electronic formats for health information, hopefully reducing medical errors and costs. Its provisions include safeguards, penalties, and notification requirements when a breach takes place. 

"Your grocery store automatically knows what brand of chips you bought last year, but your cardiologist doesn't automatically know what prescriptions your family doctor prescribed for you yesterday," U.S. Rep. John Dingell, D-Mich., said in an announcement.

In a comment, U.S. Rep. Frank Pallone, Jr. D-N.J., chairman of the Subcommittee on Health, added: "Investing in health information technology today will help make our health care system more efficient tomorrow, thereby lowering costs and saving lives."

The bill would change the HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) privacy and security rules. Specifically, it would require individuals affected by breaches of unencrypted protected health information to be notified without unreasonable delay – no more than 60 days after discovery. Another provision would permit patients to demand that information about a specific health care service not be disclosed to insurers if the patient paid for it already.

The bill also would tighten disclosure requirements, broaden individuals' rights to request disclosures, and require consent for disclosure of protected information if a provider is using an electronic medical record.

See original article on scmagazineus.com

Secure Computing Magazine

 
Ads by Google
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
Comments: 1
There has been a push on this for years. I did some installs in 05 for the new electronic file systems and if everyone uses a suitable format which is a big issue in the medical community it will be a great system. Security was fair, but access tracking was excellent so if someone looked at a record they shouldn't sysadmin's would be notified. A big plus is that if your from TN and get in a car wreck in FL the DOC will have instant access to your records.
SC Magazine - comments icon Posted by DonJun 27, 2008 11:26 PM
Report this comment as offensive:

   * Indicates information we require to process your submission.

Name: *
Email: *
Reason for offense: *
Your report will not be displayed.  
Name:
*
 
Email:
(will not be displayed)
*
 
Comment:
(HTML not permitted)
*
 
Validation
*

Enter the code you see below:

 

 
 
 
 
 
Tripwire - Click here to win an iTouch
 
 
 
Breaches & Exposures Whitepapers